August 3, 2006

Perlmonks blocking robots

Perlmonks has started blocking all robots. The message says:

# sorry, but misbehaved robots have ruined it for all of you.

I don’t get it…why try blocking robots in robots.txt? Misbehaving ones will ignore it and you’ll just exclude it from the beneficial one. Optionally, you can exclude all except for the few major search engines.

You see, here is my problem. I can’t stand the Perlmonks search engine. It is very slow and very irritating. It’s quality of results is also sometimes questionable. The way I resolve this is that I go to Google and type in
“_query term_ site:perlmonks.com” … only one problem…I can’t do that anymore! :-(

As for the SEOs that read this, I would imagine most traffic to perlmonks comes from people going there directly…They have this community bulletin board where people ask for perl programming help and people offer up their help.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
 
Loading ... Loading ...

July 18, 2006

Google to support NOODP meta tag

Reports are stating that Google will start supporting the NOODP meta tag that MSN started.

This has the advantage of not using the DMOZ descriptions (Google currently shows it for a site that has an ODP listing.

Here is an example:
Search for Ask’s Site and the first item you see is his site with the following description below it: “Blog by this Perl developer, perl.org webmaster, and Perl Foundation member.” It’s a very weak description of both Ask and his site. Descriptions, which can be suggested along with the site, are often submitted by users or editors and, sometimes, it is claimed that these editors adopt categories they have sites for so they can write bad descriptions and titles for their competition (unknown if this is true).

Here is how you implement it within the HEAD tags of your web page:

<meta NAME="ROBOTS" CONTENT="NOODP">

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
 
Loading ... Loading ...

June 30, 2006

No more MSN Searches for Yahoo

Soon, Yahoo Search Marketing’s contract with MSN will be up (by month’s end).

MSN’s U.S. search distribution agreement with Yahoo! Search Marketing ends this month, and Yahoo! Sponsored Search listings will no longer appear in MSN’s U.S. search results. Although we regret the loss of MSN as a distribution partner, it was not unexpected, and we do not anticipate a significant change in the total amount of traffic to our advertisers as a result.

We expect that MSN will continue to display Yahoo! Search Marketing Content Match listings in the U.S., and Sponsored Search listings in non-U.S. markets, beyond June 2006.

That means US search results will most likely use MSN Adcenter ads since. Content match may soon follow (my guess is that it is easy to figure out context on a search result…just use the terms typed in and match them against the terms advertisers paid for). Extracting a short and the most relevant context of a web page may require more time and collaboration with their search engine.

We’ll soon find out just how big the impact is by checking with the Overture/YSM Keyword Selector Tool which shows you how many searches for a key term happened.

We are moving in the direction of fragmentation by having multiple advertising channels, not to mention multiple advertising models such as pay-per-click, cost-per-acquisition, cost-per-call, cost-per-view or click after video (i.e. those Google video ads or Revver).

This fragmentation should lead to:

  • More specialties within marketing/advertising.
  • More services offering a singular solution that will manage campaigns with all large channels (i.e. SEM companies)–but more of the new ones should have better technical solutions than the abundance of manual ones we see now
  • More work for SEOs and SEMs to have to research the number of searches for keywords
  • More options for publishers and advertisers which may mean higher payouts to publishers (either through higher CPC or lower CPC with higher volumes of transactions) will either squeeze margins for these channels, some of which will be passed along to the advertisers…but of course the market will help define this on its own
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
 
Loading ... Loading ...

June 22, 2006

Yahoo Local adds Microformats Support

Yahoo Local is now supporting microformats. Basically, a way to make markup human-readable/understandable…but the point people are missing is that they are structuring unstructured data and make it more machine readable as well.

Yahoo points to a number of uses but fails to tell us how or i they will use this data. Surely getting additional local and event data in a structured format they can tie into their existing listings would be useful, add value to the consumer, develop more of a community as consumer contribute, and builds this user-generated content cheaply.

These microformats can be used to bolster reviews and ratings, local events tied to venues, and can provide up to date and accurate business contact information (one of the big problems many local search sites have).

more info here.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
 
Loading ... Loading ...

June 19, 2006

W3C Selling Pagerank 9 Backlinks for $1000

I was trolling around a message board that made mention of the W3C’s supporters page where they link to “supporters” (defined as having contributed money to them). If you contribute a minimum of $1000, you get a live link to your site. In addition to getting the link on the pagerank 9 page, you will also get a link on a page that provides more supporter details which is a pagerank 7.

A few notes:

  • The fees are annual
  • They are also accepting donations like software and hardware. They will be putting up a wishlist
  • It is a great deal for 2 links, pagerank 7 and 9
  • The value of the link will be diminished the more links go up on that page (pagerank is calculated by giving weight to outgoing links based on the number of outgoing links from the originating page).
  • With this information showing up all over the place (like here), Google is bound to find out about it and, when they’ve found sites that are selling links, have discounted those links
  • It is an interesting way for the W3C to make money. I wonder if they intended this to happen or if this is just a side-effect of what they were trying to do. In any case, they provide good services and information and I hope it doesn’t harm them
  • PR has been given less weight by Google but still carries some weight

In short, give for the right reasons…not to try to extract search engine (or more specifically, Google) benefit.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (2 votes, average: 3 out of 5)
 
Loading ... Loading ...

May 17, 2006

Google Replies to Big Daddy Complaints

Google had an algorithm change when it finally launched the Big Daddy update.

Since launching, a number of people have complained about various things…dropping out from the search index entirely being some of the more extreme cases.

Apparently, this update tries to do a better job of handling link farms, link-buying, and reciprocal linking.

From the post, here are a few things that you might be able to figure out:

  1. Matt points out some sites that complained and looks at their footers. He points out links to non-relevant sites (i.e. links to ring tones sites from a real estate site). This may imply that linking to other, non-relevant sites means the trust of your site is lowered. This may also mean that links found in footers are checked a bit closer (maybe even in sidebars…although no indications of that in the post).
  2. Matt also points out reciprocal linking can hurt you. This is easily done by finding a reciprocal link within each site.
  3. Google may have a hard time distinguishing some links in the case of a) advertising and b) a network of sites so I wonder how these are addressed…probably by the total number of backlinks (especially through “trusted” backlinks).
  4. In a previous post, I remember Matt suggesting that Ads have a nofollow attribute in the link. This was probably suggested to prevent these side affects so this may address the ads issues. Additionally, most “larger” sites use ad servers and javascript so these links won’t even be seen…so my guess is smaller sites are affected more by this.
  5. This also seems to be a reverse in the position that Google has had in the past. They have always said that people cannot hurt your ranking by linking to you. Well, that doesn’t seem to be the case now. Now, your competitors may have a hard time catching up to you so can be able to get you delisted entirely (not just ranked lower) simply by buying a bunch of links from non-relevant sites to you! :-(
  6. Those taking part in SEO Contests better watch out where they place their links. If they place their links on their sites (or others), they can really hurt them (one of the example links Matt provided was also to an SEO contest n a real estate site).
  7. I wonder if they are “ignoring” blogs or doing something else with them. Its quite common for them to link to different themes almost randomly (except for highly targetted ones…but personal ones seem to be all over the place some times). I suppose they may not be hurting anyone too much since they usually link from one post entry as opposed to footer links which may be in all the pages of entire sites.

Keep watching to see what other modifications/improvements there are. Google has been receptive to feedback and have been making adjustments accordingly. WMW is a good forum to express your concerns and GoogleGuy (a google employee) reads and responds to posts there. If you think you may have been affected, more instructions (including a timeline for you to use to try and determine causality) are available at Matt’s post.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
 
Loading ... Loading ...

May 8, 2006

There are still 3 character .net domains available

In case you’re wondering, there are still some 3 character .net domains available. I ran a script against a list provided to me from November and found that list of 2678 domains dropped yesterday to 1443. Today, the list is down to 1121. That’s a big jump and could be an indicator that these domains will be drying up shortly just as the .com 3 character domains have. I would expect that their price would also slowly increase.

Of the domains that I found to be available this morning, there were 203 NLL.net and 918 NLN.net.

The Latest 3 character .net available domains (based on the last time I ran the file)

UPDATE: As of 2006/03/10, there are only 274 available!!!

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
 
Loading ... Loading ...

April 28, 2006

Friday Notes for April 28, 2006

Well, it’s been a while. I’ve been pretty busy with various things lately so I have decided to roll up all my updates and summarize them in one post:

  • Congrats to Brian Pike for making CTO of Ticketmaster
  • Google is providing Sketchup for free (with a paid pro version). It will allow you to create 3D models to integrate with Google Earth. It’ll be interesting to see where they go with this. Here are some ideas
  • Ask’s presentation on MySQL is available for download. It includes lots of the stuff we learned over the years but I told him I don’t like binary data like images in the DB (store the paths to them instead) ;-)
  • Renkoo is in a closed beta. It, like Skobee, is another Evite clone that plans on doing it better. (more on skobee)
  • Yahoo launched what appears to be a fixed placement ad product. source…note that this is a posting by Matt Booth. FYI, Citysearch utilized that business model before Matt pushed for the CPC route for CS (a good idea he should get credit for).
  • TrueLocal is offering a local traffic estimator tool to advertisers. I’ll try to get around to trying it out and seeing if it provides any real value and post results here. a user can type in shoes in 60612 and the local traffic estimator determines the three most popular categories for this search and the five nearest zip codes to 60612. This allows businesses to accurately asses which categories and zip for which they should bid.…Might be useful to use this tool for all your local marketing campaigns (assuming they get enough traffic for your area where you get a good, representative sample size).
  • Microsoft is gearing up for an attack against its search engine rivals….but regular readers here already know that ;-)
  • I just came across the first mainstream news source article on the v7ndotcom elursrebmem SEO contest. I first came across this one when my blog started getting continually referer and comment spammed with “v7ndotcom elursrebmem.” I didn’t understand why they were trying to optimize those words by spamming me but googling it turned up the reason (hard to find the reason now since everyone is optimizing for those words in the contest):

    Searching on “v7ndotcom elursrebmem” on Google yesterday yielded more than 6 million matching pages. My favorite is the site ranked No. 2, which purports to be the official site for “The Grand V7ndotcom Elursrebmem Hotel,” a nonexistent hotel in London, complete with photos and a virtual tour.

  • I wonder if the CIA is reading this blog
  • We’re sellingWe’re not selling. We cater to students, we cater to business people…either way, possibly good for local advertising. Perhaps this is a way to increase their potential audience to get more subscriptions and to capture an audience that isn’t quite so fickle so they don’t become the next Friendster but, instead, tap into revenue from businesses and business networking that hangs around (and may even increase when times get rough as they may be searching for business leads).
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
 
Loading ... Loading ...

April 20, 2006

Google’s Latest Test Could Mean Fewer ClickThroughs to Your Site

Google is testing a new feature according to YellowPipe News.

The feature puts search results in an expandable/collapsible format. When you expand a result, you get more information from the site right on the search results page. It is possible that if enough information appears there, users will be prone to clicking out to other sites a lot less since they could find more of what it is they are looking for right within Google. However, it is also possible that seeing more information may indicate more relevance o the user and they would also be more prone to click on the link for a site with good, unique content.

google expandable/collapsible search results

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
 
Loading ... Loading ...

April 19, 2006

Local Search SEO

I’ve had a number of people recently ask me about how to optimize their small business sites for local search engines.

I’ve seen many people post many different links, some correct and some obviously incorrect in their assumptions.

You optimize your site to increase traffic to your site with the intention of converting (i.e. clicks, sales, etc). For small businesses, the conversions are most often sales or products or services.

With the ultimate goal defined above in mind, your first optimization technique has little to do with changing things on your site.

What you need to do is go directly to the data providers. You see, most search engines start with a base data provider…a company that creates this data, may have some checks to clean up the data, and resells it. Some iYPs will actually buy this data as well but others have access to the data from their offline counterparts and can use this information to build out local search data instead (but will usually supplement it since most of these listings will have minimal metadata associated with each business such as an address, category and phone number only). To see an (incomplete or generalized) overview of base data providers and local search engines, take a look at Bruce Clay’s Local Search Engine Relationship Chart.

So, step 1 is to go to the base data providers and make sure they have your business listed, with the correct address and phone number. Additionally, many of them will collect whatever additional information you may be willing to provide (i.e. a URL).

Here is a list of the top few data providers:

Be warned, though. Entering this information may mean you will not only end up in the data directories they license to others, but it also means your information (including contact information you submit such as email, contact name, and phone) will end up on their marketing lead list.

Additionally, although all of this information may end up in their database, most sites pay a price for this data based on a certain collection of fields which may not include, for example, your business URL. So if you hire an SEO, make sure you attribute these additional offline leads (i.e. walk-ins or phone calls) as well (though you would be hard-pressed to find out a tracking mechanism short of asking each user where they found you and researching the data source).

What if you correct or add your business listing in a site that uses their data? Some of these data providers are providing APIs for their licensees to submit corrected information. However, very few, if any, of these large sites will submit this updated information to the base data providers. They know that they would be strengthening their competitor’s site by doing this as well as losing ownership of this updated information (most sites set up terms of service so they own the data submitted by users). The data existing on their site only becomes a market differentiators as well as a sort of intellectual property…so once you submit your data to the base data providers, you can go to the larger sites (i.e. Google, Yahoo, Yellowpages.com, Superpages, and Citysearch) and update or add additional info that is missing such as website urls, etc.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 5 out of 5)
 
Loading ... Loading ...
« Previous entries · Next entries »